A train wreck we all are witnessing

Right out of the gate she refuses to answer questions. Instead we get a meme talking point and filibustering. This idea of a broken system is idiotic. It has been the excuse since Reagan. So the system is broken and they all just keep letting it run? If your brakes on your car squeal you just keep driving for decades? Or do you stop driving it?

Then we get deflection on her support of trans surgeries for prisoners and more filibustering and subject changes. Yet no specifics on what or how she would change anything and on to blaming Trump. Just all spring flowers, birds and unicorns. Just believe. Her lack of being able

This spending time on blaming Trump for HER failures is sickening. The only thing that can be deduced from her refusing to be specific is she either has no plan or has a plan than few Americans would support.

Turning military on American people? Is she serious?

The Differences Between the 2016 and 2024 Versions

1. Focus of the 2016 Version

The 2016 version of the directive did not mention the use of lethal force. Instead, it focused on:

• Civil liberties protections: Ensuring strict oversight for operations involving U.S. citizens.

• Intelligence collection restrictions: Limiting when and how U.S. person's information (USPI) could be collected.

• Privacy safeguards: Protecting privacy rights and preventing unauthorized data collection.

The 2016 directive centered around intelligence gathering, with no mention of lethal force.

2. New Provisions in the 2024 Version

The 2024 update introduces a dramatic shift, particularly regarding domestic operations. Section 3.3.a.(2)(c) now explicitly permits lethal force in cases of imminent threats or national security emergencies, provided the action complies with legal oversight, specifically DoDD 5210.56, which governs the use of deadly force by DoD personnel.

Key updates include:

• Use of lethal force: The directive allows military intelligence components to assist law enforcement in operations that involve lethal force.

• Conditions for force: The directive specifies lethal force can be used under conditions involving imminent threats.

• Legal oversight: Any use of lethal force must comply with DoDD 5210.56, ensuring proper legal frameworks are followed.

Pentagon Directive 5240.01 of September 27, 2024 allows the US military to use "lethal means" against US citizens when assisting police officers during riots. This directive also expands the scope of application of unmanned systems for the same cases.

This “ new and improved” directive was signed by Biden September 27, 2024! This directive contradicts the Posse Comitatus law, which limits the government's authority to use military personnel to ensure law and order within the United States.

Then we have her advocating just this!

https://x.com/realJoelFischer/status/1844184014896365975

PEOPLE WAKE UP! This woman is an authoritarian, their is a reason she will no be specific - her plan is authoritarianism and you will submit or she is going to send the US military against you. Why do we as Americans think our government is any different than any other? The Constitution? Yes, but if the government is not following it what does it matter?

I have covered what powers WE DELEGATED to the federal government here:

This is why the founders did NOT want a standing army/military. They knew eventually it would be used against the US citizen. If you think well yea but I’m with her - I’d never be in her sites, Trotsky and others thought the same about Stalin. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lenins-TestamentThose that helped XI come to power

Then we have former Chinese leader Hu Jintao, taken out of a Communist Party meeting never to be heard from again.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/28/china/china-party-congress-hu-jintao-new-video-intl-hnk/index.html

You are delusional if you think supporting Harris and these Democrats will not result in the squashing of you and your family. You are what the communists call a useful idiot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot

A useful idiot or useful fool is a pejorative description of a person, suggesting that the person thinks they are fighting for a cause without fully comprehending the consequences of their actions, and who does not realize they are being manipulated by the cause's leaders or by other political players.

Then we have her deflecting to Trump when asked when she knew Joe Biden was no longer capable. Then she goes on to say he still has the faculties ? What is she no seeing? or is she lying?

Wow, she cannot even handle Brett Bair, how is she going to handle the Mullahs in Iran? Putin? The only fat person in North Korea?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13968765/kamala-harris-bret-baie-fox-news-interview.html

She refuses to answer questions with specifics, she constructs a word salad with the same tired old talking points. At this point one has to ask - what is wrong with her? What is wrong with her supporters? What are they not seeing that is plan as the nose on their face? She goes on to blame Trump for HER failures- Trump has not been in office for over 3.5 years - just like a little kid she blames others. I suppose Trump marshaled forces to keep her from doing her assigned job at the border.

This woman is intellectually vacant. She has BS’ed her way to where she is at using her sex and race to squash any real analysis of her. That is NOT going to work on the world scene, if she cannot handle Bret Bair she sure’s hell is not going to handle the Mullahs, Putin, Xi or Kim Jung. Getting on your knees and begging is not a viable plan.

For those not voting because of their Trump hate or for those voting for Harris - is this the type of person you want on the world stage representing us? Someone that cannot handle a interview? If she cannot handle a interview just how is she going to handle and of the above? We are at a critical juncture in the US and the world. WE are in WW3 it is a time to look at who we are voting for and their capabilities - not their personalities.