Progressives - the eugenicists, the racists, the great deceivers amongst us.
The history of eugenicists is a sordid one of deceit, racism, human experimentation and the planned elimination of segments of society.
Eugenicist promise
VS reality
Deceit is where it starts, eugenicists use words that trigger many into believing they actually care about the human race, when actually it is just the opposite. They claim they want to make society a better place, but the reality is they want to cleanse it of people they think are inferior.
Eugenics in the USA started around the time just prior to the election of Woodrow Wilson.
A short history of the start of eugenics:
WE cannot properly cover eugenics without covering its start.
Sir Francis Galton a cousin of Charles Darwin was the originator of the term eugenics.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19602363/
Eugenics, defined as the science of improving racial stock, was developed from a new heredity theory, conceived by Galton himself, and from the evolution theory of Charles Darwin, transposed to human society by Herbert Spencer. Galton's eugenics was a program to artificially produce a better human race through regulating marriage and thus procreation.
From this beginning academia picked up the idea and ran with it. From there a small spattering of associations and laws were created:
1896: Connecticut enacted a marriage law with eugenic criteria, prohibiting people deemed "epileptic, imbecile or feeble-minded" from marrying.
Early 1900s: The movement gained momentum, led by individuals like Charles Davenport and Harry Laughlin, who believed in improving the human species through selective breeding.
1903: The American Breeders Association was founded to study eugenics.
1907: Indiana passed the first state eugenics sterilization law, allowing for the sterilization of individuals in institutions deemed "idiots" or "imbeciles," as well as certain classes of criminals.
1910: Charles Davenport established the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. The ERO played a significant role in promoting eugenic ideas and advocating for legislation.
1916 Margaret Sanger opens first birth control clinic.
1927: The US Supreme Court, in the case of Buck v. Bell, upheld the constitutionality of state compulsory sterilization laws, providing a legal precedent for forced sterilizations that followed.
One of the more prominent eugenicists was Woodrow Wilson, the election of Woodrow Wilson in 1912 to the Presidency of the USA ushered in the eugenics movement to the upper echelon of the US Government.
Woodrow Wilson's views on race were deeply problematic and shaped his policies, which set back racial equality in the United States
.Key aspects of Wilson's views and actions on race:
Belief in white supremacy and inferiority of Black people: Wilson held and expressed racist views, believing Black people were inherently inferior.
Support for segregation: He actively supported and implemented racial segregation policies, particularly within the federal government.
Segregation of the federal workforce: Immediately upon taking office in 1913, Wilson's administration began segregating federal agencies like the Post Office and Treasury Department, creating separate facilities and limiting opportunities for Black employees.
Impact of segregation: This segregation negatively impacted the careers and economic prospects of Black civil servants, widening the racial earnings gap and eroding the gains made during Reconstruction.
Appointing segregationists to his cabinet: Wilson appointed cabinet members with segregationist views who implemented these discriminatory policies.
Defense of segregation: When confronted by Black leaders, Wilson defended segregation as a measure to reduce "friction" between the races, even claiming it benefited Black workers by protecting their positions.
Screening of "The Birth of a Nation": Wilson screened the controversial and racist film "The Birth of a Nation," which glorified the Ku Klux Klan and presented a distorted view of Reconstruction. His action, or rather inaction by not distancing himself from the film, was seen as an endorsement by many and contributed to the film's success.
"Lost Cause" narrative: Wilson's writings and historical works, particularly "A History Of The American People," promoted the "Lost Cause" narrative, romanticizing the Confederacy and portraying slavery as a benevolent institution. He even defended the Ku Klux Klan as a necessary force to "protect the southern country" during Reconstruction.
In summary, Woodrow Wilson's presidency is marked by a legacy of significant racial inequality and the implementation of discriminatory policies that harmed the progress of Black Americans
https://global.oup.com/us/companion.websites/libertyandjustice/ch6/02/
In an 1889 essay, future President Woodrow Wilson, after describing the “great advantages” of the “big and strenuous” American body politic, warned of the dangers to the country’s “character” resulting from the “corruption of foreign blood.”
https://woodrowwilsonhouse.org/wilson-topics/wilson-and-race/
https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/chapter-19-the-progressive-era-eugenics/
Wilson was not alone in supporting eugenics, the movement had many adherents, Prominent Americans – among them Theodore Roosevelt, Stanford University President David Starr Jordan, W. E. B. Du Bois, and Margaret Sanger – supported the eugenics movement, as did such organizations as the National Federation of Women’s Clubs, the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, and various religious organizations. State Fairs included Better Baby contests (Document F). As the list of its supporters indicates, eugenics was considered a progressive reform, related to the larger Progressive movement by its emphasis on the good of society and the use of science and rationality to achieve it.
Despite the opposition it faced, eugenic sterilization remained alive in part because of the Supreme Court decision Buck v. Bell (Document E), which found constitutional the sterilization of Carrie Buck by the State of Virginia. From the beginning, Buck’s sterilization was intended to be a test case. Supporters of eugenics and sterilization hoped the case would reach the Supreme Court and that the Court would find sterilization constitutional. This would at once supersede all the rulings of state courts against sterilization. Buck’s guardian, appointed by those intending to sterilize her, took her case to Virginia state courts and eventually the Supreme Court. (The lower Virginia court found no grounds to block the sterilization.) The Supreme Court decided that nothing in the U.S. Constitution prevented Virginia from sterilizing Buck. Eight of nine justices joined in the decision, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, perhaps the preeminent jurist of the time. Holmes’ decision contained the now infamous remark, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The only dissent in the case came from Associate Justice Pierce Butler, a Catholic.
Sterilization continued as a legal regime even after eugenics ceased to be a popular movement. Thirty-one states eventually had sterilization programs, often adopting the language of the Virginia legislation that the Supreme Court approved, which had been drafted by a lawyer to increase its chances of meeting legal scrutiny. Sterilizations increased and did not cease until the 1960s. (The sterilization program in North Carolina lasted until 1977.) California, a leading Progressive state, sterilized about 20,000 people, a third or so of the almost 70,000 individuals sterilized in the United States.
Toward the end of his discussion of eugenics (Document B), G. Stanley Hall wrote of “the kingdom of some kind of superman” to which eugenics might lead. This remark foreshadowed the darkness of the Holocaust and reminds us that Hitler cited America’s eugenics movement and laws as a precedent.
The culmination of eugenics being out in the open was the travesty of WW2 and Nazi Germany’s horror of extermination of people they declared “unfit”. Jews: Jews were the primary target of Nazi persecution, leading to the Holocaust, the systematic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of six million Jews.
Individuals with Disabilities: People with mental or physical disabilities were subjected to forced sterilization and murder under the Nazi's "euthanasia" program (Action T4).
Romani People: Romani people were considered "racially inferior" and faced persecution, forced labor, and mass murder.
Political Opponents and Dissenters: Communists, socialists, trade unionists, and anyone who opposed the Nazi regime were targeted for imprisonment, torture, and death.
LGBTQ+ individuals: Gay men were persecuted under Nazi laws, imprisoned in concentration camps, and some were murdered.
Jehovah's Witnesses: Jehovah's Witnesses were persecuted for their refusal to swear allegiance to Hitler or participate in military service.
Slavs: Slavic peoples, particularly Poles and Russians, were considered "subhuman" and were targeted for forced labor, extermination, and displacement as part of the Nazi plan for eastern expansion.
Black People: Black people living in Germany faced discrimination, forced sterilization, and some were murdered.
Other Groups: The Nazis also targeted individuals labeled as "social deviants," such as beggars, prostitutes, and pacifists, as well as anyone who did not conform to their rigid social and racial ideology.
All were actively persecuted and exterminated. It simply was too much for common people so the leaders of eugenics went underground. They did not disappear.
Since WW2 the eugenics movement took a kinder/gentler path. Using calming great sounding language all the while continuing their racist and superior breeding stock experiments.
From the Tuskegee Syphilis Study clinical study conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service from 1932 to 1972 using black men infected ON PURPOSE by the US Public Health Service. Which is STILL in existence today!
https://www.usphs.gov/about-us
I did not even know this agency existed until I did the research for this article. How is it that this agency was not disbanded after this experiment on black men?
Tuskegee violated several fundamental ethical principles of medical research, including the rights to informed consent, bodily autonomy, and access to treatment.
Researchers deliberately withheld treatment, even after penicillin became widely available, and deceived the participants about the true nature of their condition. The participants were not informed they had syphilis and were instead told they were being treated for "bad blood". They were not given the opportunity to provide informed consent for participating in the study.
Tuskegee resulted in significant harm to the participants, with many dying from syphilis or related complications, and others suffering from long-term health issues. Furthermore, wives and children were also infected due to the lack of treatment and knowledge.
Tuskegee ended in 1972 after being exposed by a whistleblower, Peter Buxtun.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study remains a reminder of the dangers of unethical research practices. It has significantly impacted the relationship between the African American community and the medical establishment, contributing to mistrust and hesitancy towards healthcare and research. The study serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for racism and prejudice to influence medical research and the need for ongoing vigilance to ensure ethical practices
Now let’s look at the last 5 years and see if the eugenicist disappeared after 1973.
How well does the covid response line up with the Tuskegee experiment and eugenicists modus operandi?
#1 Tuskegee violated several fundamental ethical principles of medical research, including the rights to informed consent, bodily autonomy, and access to treatment.
CHECK! no one was given informed consent on the C-19 jab. It was impossible as it was listed as a Emergency Use and the informed consent paperwork with the vials was blank.
Bodily autonomy: The US Government mandated the jab for anyone working at a place with over 100 employees, and all government workers. Most businesses also required it. You either got the jab or were fired. So CHECK!
#2 withholding of treatment. Even after it became clear Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were excellent treatments for C-19 the hospital protocols of venting ( which they knew would result in death) Remdesivir ( which again resulted in death) were kept in place. Family was told they could not see their loved ones in hospitals and nursing homes. Many died with no one around to comfort them. This WAS intentional. It was a genocide against the elderly.
CHECK CHECK CHECK
#3 Tuskegee resulted in significant harm to the participants, with many dying from syphilis or related complications, and others suffering from long-term health issues. Furthermore, wives and children were also infected due to the lack of treatment and knowledge.
News is now flooding us with the harms these jabs have caused, from clotting to myocarditis, auto immune disease, and even death. Their is also credible evidence that even the un jabbed are effected by shedding of the c-19 jabbed.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29033339/
Genetic engineering now enables the design of live viral vaccines that are potentially transmissible.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12031016/
When the H&E and MT staining results were evaluated under light microscopy, the ovarian tissue of the control group showed a normal appearance, with a cortex containing follicles at different stages of development on the outside and a medulla layer with loose connective tissue and an extensive vascular network on the inside (Figure 1A,D). In the mRNA vaccine group, atrophic areas in the ovarian medulla and an increase in the number and enlargement in the diameter of blood vessels were observed (Figure 1B,E). Similar findings were observed in the ovarian medulla in the inactivated vaccine group, although not as much as in the mRNA vaccine group (Figure 1C,F).
So in at least rats the mRNA jab is affecting the reproductive system, their are now stories about the effects of the C-19 jab on women also. This has been pointed out early on during C-19 and the jab.
Transmittable vaccines are supposedly on the works, however I would submit they have already been used. Seeing how the C-19 jab affects some people when in close quarters with the jabbed.
The following is from a AI inquiry:
A transmissible vaccine, also known as a transmissible viral vaccine (TVV), is a type of vaccine that can be passed from a vaccinated individual to others, potentially increasing herd immunity. These vaccines are typically made from live viruses, either attenuated (weakened) or recombinant vector vaccines, and are designed to replicate within the vaccinated host, allowing for transmission to others through normal social interactions. While this transmission can be beneficial for broader protection, it also raises concerns about potential risks and unintended consequences.
Key aspects of transmissible vaccines:
Mechanism:
Transmissible vaccines utilize live viruses that can replicate within the host, triggering an immune response and potentially spreading to others.
Potential Benefits:
They can increase herd immunity, offering protection to individuals who cannot be directly vaccinated or in hard-to-reach populations.
Potential Risks:
Transmission can lead to vaccine evolution, potentially creating new variants, and there's a risk of reversion to a more pathogenic form.
Examples:
Attenuated and recombinant vector vaccines are currently used and have the potential for transmission.
Current Status:
Transmissible vaccines are still largely in the research and development phase, with no widely deployed examples in human populations.
Examples of Transmissible Vaccines:
Examples of transmissible vaccines include those for measles, rubella, polio, and rotavirus.
Ethical and Social Considerations:
The potential for unintended consequences and the need for careful risk assessment are crucial considerations.
In essence, transmissible vaccines are a promising area of research with the potential to revolutionize disease control, but they also require careful consideration of potential risks and ethical implications before widespread deployment
So where is the informed consent to be infected with a medical intervention here?
Check!
#4 whistle blowers are coming forward on the C-19 jab but they for the most part are not being covered by the media.
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson (video 1), emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.
So we now see that the eugenicists have not disappeared but have completely taken over the government agencies, medical community and media. They are actively working right in front of us. With sites like 23 and me doing genetic testing and now selling the results of that to phamra and government we are nothing but genetic material to be used for their pleasure and experiments. Many of us have been conned into doing this genetic testing and letting them keep the data. This is not going to end well for us. With the current advancements in genetics these people can make some virus or concoction to make sick or kill people with a certain genetic make up. This is a dangerous time for humanity and many of us are helping them!
While they deny it people like Bill Gates and his GAVI and various other organizations are promoting eugenics. Gates has no medical background but is actively pushing injectables and transmittable vaccines.
Then we have our own Josef Mengele ( infamous Nazi doctor that ran experiments on people ) Anthony Fauci. Fauci has a sordid history on witholding medical treatments that work. He insisted that only AZT be used to treat aids. He did the same with Covid. He set the standards to keep Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine from being used. The ONLY way a Emergency use authorization for a jab is for their to be no other solution.
WE must be vigilant on our right to bodily autonomy and fully informed consent be our primary objects to protect ourselves from these mad people. We must watch their language and their actions and not allow them to force us into their vortex of conrol and human ownership.