Harris supports home invasion?
Yes she does! For any government agent to enter your home and “check” to see if you’re storing anything safely is a crazy idea. This lawyer/prosecutor elected representative has and is actively ignoring the Constitutional protects in the Bill of rights. Is she ignorant? NO! is she a authoritarian that thinks she should be the decider? YES!
Why is she not having her law license revoked? Why are people supporting her and her idea of what will end up with people being dead? Why is she supporting the violation of the 4th Amendment?
Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
We're going to require responsible behaviors among everybody in the community, and just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way you conduct your affairs," Harris told a group of reporters in May 2007.
Who is deciding this “legally possessed” idea? Yep the world champ mass murderers - government. Who is deciding who gets their home broken into? Yep government. Why are so many people accepting of this idea of government as guardian and protector when the opposite is the truth?
What else is she going to support home invasion on? Your children and their care? What food you are eating? Where is the line drawn? After all she is just wanting to provide you with safety.
Mass murder, racism and gun control
I find it rather puzzling that people support gun control and want the world champs of mass murder to decide who will be allowed to own arms and what arms are allowed to be owned by a allegedly free people.
The LIES Harris is spewing are unbelievable, she has actually used nobody is taking your guns away and mandatory buybacks in the same speech. Is it really that mind boggling that people believe the former when she stated the latter also at the same time? How is a mandatory buy back not taking guns away. Its like saying you have a choice - you run head long into the wall voluntarily or I am going to smash you into the wall - your choice. Either way are you not being slammed into the wall?
Now she is bragging that she owns a gun, she stated on the recent love fest on Oprah that she would shoot an intruder - laughing as she said it. Apparently she thinks shooting people is hilarious and not something serious. NEWSFLASH if you shoot someone you ARE taking a life, its not a laughing matter at all. Harris is not a serious person or even a fully functioning adult. She is a woman - child whom else would cackle like that when saying she would shoot someone?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/harris-defends-gun-ownership-says-she-d-shoot-burglars/ar-AA1qTKws
This is not surprising coming from her. She thinks war is some kind of video game also and is poking and prodding to start one. AGAIN NEWSFLASH wars kill and injure people - its a serious matter and to just run around like she does poking and prodding adversaries and goading them will end in death and destruction - its not a laughing matter.
She supports mandatory buy backs. This political article would be funny if not so condescending, parsing and full of just out right lies.
The phrase "gun confiscation" is broad and could lead voters to think that Harris wants to confiscate all guns from law-abiding owners. That’s not what she has said.
Further, those rights are constitutionally protected by the Second Amendment. In the U.S. gun buybacks are programs organized by local police departments that voluntarily allow people to turn over their guns in exchange for something, such as a gift card.
While running in the presidential primary in 2019, the then-California senator said she supported a "mandatory gun buyback program" for assault weapons. It did not apply to all guns, and she no longer holds that position.
Gun confiscation is broad and its broad because the supporters of mass murderers having the monopoly on committing violence is their end goal. ANY form of gun control - mandatory buy back, home invasions is just the camels nose in the tent. That is the way it worked on Nazi Germany, USSR, Venezuela and everywhere they are regulated by those supporting mass murderers.
Politifact conflates mandatory with voluntary - apparently this works on many people as I have heard this so many times I’ve lost count. How does mandatory mean voluntary? IT DOES NOT!
Its time to stop this conflating of terms, the euphemisms. Words have specific meanings if they all mean the same thing then why have all the words?
Voluntary - Done or undertaken of one's own free will.
Mandatory - Required or commanded by authority; obligatory.
Do those two words have the same meaning? Is their a punishment for not obeying one of them?
We have a segment of the population that just mimics lines and lies spewed by politicians and the media. They parrot what they are told like a caged bird. This segment f the population is steadily grown to a near majority. We have to figure out ways to make them think critically and question authority.
We need to question the “experts”. We all have the ability to think critically, we just do not. Why not? Its hard, it required effort, research. time and sometimes you will be the lone voice in the wilderness point out the issues. While it is easy to go with the flow and just accept we have seen that throughout history this cultish behaviour leads to the death of these people. They willingly line up in the proverbial firing line to be done away with, without so much as a whimper.
Chilling historical precedence
I am currently listening to this audible book. It is a chilling story of how ordinary men just followed order to round up Jews and calmly execute them. It is truly frightening just how easily people are willing to round up and murder people wantonly because they are told to do so. Not even strangers but they helped round up people they knew.
For some reason people think they are immune to this, yet if you talk to them they blindly accept what government or some other expert tells them.
If we fail to learn from history we will repeat it.
The Expert class
Their is actually quite a bit of study behind this and it is truly interesting. Probably one of the more well know ones is Stanley Milgrams Obedience to Authority done in the 1960s. The other is The Asch experiments.
If we plan on staying a free unowned people we must start questioning and stop accepting what we are being told, we need to think! Government owning us is no different that some private individual owning us. If government is determining what you are allowed they are telling you they own you.
100% agree with the article!
If they expect me to wait on Officer Peterson then they are expecting too much.